Who’s liable when AI goes rogue?
This week, Dave and Ben look at two stories with the first involving a recent bill introduced into the US House of Representatives that looks to clarify the confusion around AI liability. The second story involves a court case where an AI generated video was able to sway a judge's opinion.
Additionally, Dave sits down with Garfield Jones, Senior Vice President of Research and Strategy at QuSecure and former CISA Homeland security exec for quantum, to discuss post-quantum migration efforts and the impact that it will have on organizations.
While this show covers legal topics, and Ben is a lawyer, the views expressed do not constitute legal advice. For official legal advice on any of the topics we cover, please contact your attorney.
Links to today's stories:
- House proposal would clarify liability rules for AI agents.
- Her AI-Generated Video Swayed the Judge. The Court Said it Carried 'Undue Emotional Weight.'
Get the weekly Caveat Briefing delivered to your inbox.
Like what you heard? Be sure to check out and subscribe to our Caveat Briefing, a weekly newsletter available exclusively to N2K Pro members on N2K CyberWire's website. N2K Pro members receive our Thursday wrap-up covering the latest in privacy, policy, and research news, including incidents, techniques, compliance, trends, and more.
This week's Caveat Briefing looks recent reports that banking regulators are looking to step up their AI oversight efforts. Curious about the details? Head over to the Caveat Briefing for the full scoop and additional compelling stories.
Got a question you'd like us to answer on our show? You can send your audio file to caveat@thecyberwire.com. Hope to hear from you.
